Bridget Louise Riley CH CBE (born 24 April 1931) is an English painter who is one of the foremost exponents of Op art. She currently lives and works in London, Cornwall and the Vaucluse in France.
I learned from Seurat this important thing about colour and light, that 'a light' can be built from colour. I learned a great deal about interaction, that 'a blue' in different parts will play all sorts of different roles.
It is important that the painting can be inhabited, so that the mind's eye, or the eye's mind, can move about it credibly.
I work on two levels. I occupy my conscious mind with things to do, lines to draw, movements to organize, rhythms to invent. In fact, I keep myself occupied. But that allows other things to happen which I'm not controlling. . . the more I exercise my conscious mind, the more open the other things may find that they can come through.
For me nature is not landscape, but the dynamism of visual forces.
Focusing isn't just an optical activity; it is also a mental one.
In my earlier paintings, I wanted the space between the picture plane and the spectator to be active.
I never make studies from nature. They would get in the way. I make use of my mind.
Painting is, I think, inevitably an archaic activity and one that depends on spiritual values.
I used to build up to sensation, accumulating tension until it released a perceptual experience
As the artist picks his way along, rejecting and accepting as he goes, certain patterns of enquiry emerge.
In my earlier paintings, I wanted the space between the picture plane and the spectator to be active. It was in that space, paradoxically, the painting 'took place. ' Then, little by little, and to some extent deliberately, I made it go the other way, opening up an interior space. . . so that there was a layered, shallow depth.
Painters have always needed a sort of veil upon which they can focus their attention. It's as though the more fully the consciousness is absorbed, the greater the freedom of the spirit behind
The eye can travel over the surface in a way parallel to the way it moves over nature. It should feel caressed and soothed, experience frictions and ruptures, glide and drift. One moment, there will be nothing to look at and the next second the canvas seems to refill, to be crowded with visual events.
It was only after I had been out of the art school that I actually copied a small Seurat, and I copied it in order to follow his thought, because if you do copy an artist, and you have a close feeling for him, in fact that you need to know more about his work, there is no better way than actually to copy, because you get very close indeed to how somebody thinks.
As a painter today you have to work without that essential platform. But if one does not deceive oneself and accepts this lack of certainty, other things may come into play.
An artist's failures are as valuable as his successes: by misjudging one thing he conforms something else, even if at the time he does not know what that something else is.
If you can allow colour to breathe, to occupy its own space, to play its own game in its unstable way, it's wanton behaviour, so to speak. It is promiscuous like nothing.
It seems the deeper, truer personality of the artist only emerges in the making of decisions. . . in refusing and accepting, changing and revising.
The actual basis of colour is instability. Once you accept that in lieu of something which is stable, which is form, you are dealing with something which is unstable in its basic character, you begin to get a way of dealing with it.
I work with nature, although in completely new terms.