When overpowering authority or leadership intervenes in a team, it can affect the team by (1) throwing the team off track, (2) decreasing the motivation of the team, (3) reducing the commitment of the team members, and (4) causing more problems than solutions.
I have no question that when you have a team, the possibility exists that it will generate magic, producing something extraordinary But don't count on it.
Hackman's paradox: Groups have natural advantages: they have more resources than individuals; greater diversity of resources; more flexibility in deploying the resources; many opportunities for collective learning; and, the potential for synergy. Yet studies show that their actual performance often is subpar relative to "nominal" groups (i. e. individuals given the same task but their results are pooled. ) The two most common reasons: groups are assigned work that is better done by individuals or are structured in ways that cap their full potential.
If you are in an improv jazz ensemble or a small chamber group, you learn to think fast on your feet and how to be flexible and to collaborate and compromise, and that may yield a creative outcome.
Caspar Weinberger
Kate Green
William Blaikie
Daniel Cormier
Charles Rennie Mackintosh
Nicole Ari Parker
Earl Weaver
Conrad Aiken
Charlie Watts
Aristides of Athens
Spiro T. Agnew
Warren Gatland
