I am not a representative of anything. When art historians or critics or the public put somebody in a drawer like this, it has a tranquilizing, paralyzing effect. Artists are individuals. They have ideas, and the conventions for one's self as an individual are not for a group. There are always those who follow the group, but they belong in the margins. I refuse to be placed within, or added to, one particular school.
The intellectual is an individual with a specific public role in society that cannot be reduced simply to. . a faceless professional.
Theres a fear that grasps each individual and what they think is right and what they think is wrong.
No two minds ever come together without a third invisible force, which may be likened to a 'third mind. ' When a group of individual minds are coordinated and function in harmony, the increased energy created through that alliance becomes available to every individual in the group.
Art is the work of a human, an individual seeking to make a statement, to cause a reaction, to connect. Art is something new, every time, and art might not work, precisely because it's new, because it's human and because it seeks to connect.
To further the appreciation of culture among all the people, to increase respect for the creative individual, to widen participation by all the processes and fulfillments of artthis is one of the fascinating challenges of these days.
The most important phase of living with a person: the respect for that person as an individual.
I REPRESENT THE INDIVIDUAL. I REPRESENT BEING HAPPY WITH WHO YOU ARE
The fact that the majority wants something good does not give them the right to use force on the minority that don't want to pay for it. If you have to use a gun, it's not really a very good idea. Democracy without respect for individual rights sucks. It's just ganging up on the weird kid, and I'm always the weird kid.
The equal rights of man and the happiness of every individual are now acknowledged to be the only legitimate objects of government.
Style is something very individual, very personal, and in their own unique way, I believe everyone is stylish.
One of the methods of manipulation is to inoculate individuals with the bourgeois appetite for personal success.
The heart of the liberal philosophy is a belief in the dignity of the individual, in his freedom to make the most of his capacities and opportunities according to his own lights. . . This implies a belief in the equality of man in one sense; in their inequality in another.
In the gametes of an individual hybrid the Anlagen for each individual parental character are found in all possible combinations but never in a single gamete the Anlagen for a pair of characters. Each combination occurs with approximately the same frequency.
I grew up with a good set of values, but it was never too strict. I was always encouraged to be a free-thinking individual.
I think nothing is religion which puts one individual absolutely above others, and surely nothing is religion which puts one sex above another.
We have to have the Vision. And we have to form the Intention. And we have to adopt the Means. Vision. Intention. Means. And if we do that, then it works! Every individual, every church, every organization. . . that's all we need to do.
We can most safely achieve truly universal tolerance when we respect that which is characteristic in the individual and in nations, clinging, though, to the conviction that the truly meritorious is unique by belonging to all of mankind.
All of us have our individual curses, something that we are uncomfortable with and something that we have to deal with, like me making horror films, perhaps.
A difficult situation, not for one individual, but for everybody