Redefine the possible.
We don't need to 'control' free speech, we need to control ourselves.
When people try to stop free speech, stop people from talking, it creates pressure in the system that might cause people to act out.
Free speech is the bedrock of liberty and a free society. And yes, it includes the right to blaspheme and offend.
New and stirring things are belittled because if they are not belittled the humiliating question arises 'Why then are you not taking part in them?
There is stupid. And then there is cyberstupid.
The great thing about the Internet is that it will not abide by the rules.
The deadliest bullshit is odorless, and transparent.
Aesthetic freedom is like free speech; it is, indeed, a form of free speech.
In the United States, unlike any other advanced democracy, money really talks. Our Supreme Court has said that spending money on politicians is a form of free speech. No other court has said that.
The right to free speech is more important than the content of the speech.
We shouldn't have free speech.
The Democrats do not like free speech. And that's not an exaggeration.
Equally, the Internet interprets attempts at proprietary control as threats and mobilizes to defeat them.
Free speech is too dangerous to a democracy to be permitted
Free speech is a bourgeois prejudice.
We travel the world, and our right to free speech is precious.
Free speech is life itself.
There is no such thing as part freedom.
None but the dead have free speech.