The National Socialist Party in Austria never tried to hide its inclination for a greater Germany. That Austria would one day return to the Reich was a matter of course for all National Socialists and for true Germans in Austria.
As far as I'm concerned, the only difference between the Republicans and the Democrats is the Republicans are Socialists and the Democrats are Bolsheviks.
We should have had socialism already, but for the socialists.
Should the progressives in Germany in the 30s have tolerated the National Socialists? Of course they shouldn't have.
First they came for the Jews, but I did nothing because I'm not a Jew. Then they came for the socialists, but I did nothing because I'm not a socialist. Then they came for the Catholics, but I did nothing because I'm not a Catholic. Finally, they came for me, but by then there was no one left to help me.
All world-improvers are Socialists. And consequently there are no Classical world-improvers.
I am the head of the Socialists, but the party is not my property.
Why is it always the "intelligent" people who are socialists?
There have been as many varieties of socialists as there are wild birds that fly in the woods and sometimes go up and on through the clouds.
If we buy into the notion that somehow property rights are less important, or are in conflict with, human or civil rights, we give the socialists a freer hand to attack our property.
Socialists try to convince us that the tea becomes sweet not because of sugar, but because of mixing.
Perhaps the values of socialists can only be realized by socialists in a nonsocialist society.
Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out - because I was not a socialist.
Socialists cry “Power to the people”, and raise the clenched fist as they say it. We all know what they really mean - power over people, power to the State.
We're not a socialist country, because the socialists believe in government ownership in the means of production, but the fascists believe that the government should have private ownership and the politicians should tell people how to run the businesses. So that's the route we seem to be going.
Capitalism is using its money; we socialists throw it away.
Populism is the simple premise that markets need to be restrained by society and by a democratic political system. We are not socialists or communists, we are proponents of regulated capitalism and, I might add, people who have read American history.
Good Conservatives always pay their bills. And on time. Not like the Socialists who run up other people's bills.
For socialists, not just the wealth, but the guilt must be redistributed.
If socialists understood economics, they wouldn't be socialist.
