All men are NOT created equal before God; the facts of heaven and hell, election and reprobation make clear that they are not equal. Moreover, an employer has aproperty rights to prefer whom he will in terms of "color" creed, race or national origin.
God is not an employer looking for employees. He is an Eagle looking for people who will take refuge under his wings.
It's all about who gets to work and making sure they're legally present in our country. And to do that nationally E-verify becomes a key component. It certainly needs to available, effective and as inexpensive as possible and that employer needs to use it as a tool. Some of the arguments that are made about how it works or does not work don't carry much water with me. I've already used it for several years. It works.
No employer today is independent of those about him. He cannot succeed alone, no matter how great his ability or capital. Business today is more than ever a question of cooperation.
An employer of mine back in the '80s was kind enough to take me on after a rough patch, and it made a big difference in my life that I knew I was the sort of person who showed up on time. It's a basic tell of character.
Labor can and will become its own employer through co-operative association.
Time is the ultimate equal opportunity employer.
Trust and mutual value creation helps both employer and employee compete in the marketplace.
For heaven's sake, this is 2015. I've run the largest technology company in the world. Let me assure you we know how to build an employer verification system that would work. We can solve this. We just need to do it.
I definitely don't want to make Nicholas Kristof defend your employer, no one should have to do that but a sincere question.
No employer is going to hire robustly until they know what the health care cost is going to be.
My employer was never at any time aware of anything in my past beyond the writing I did, because, frankly, it isn't relevant to the job I was asked to do, which was to be a reporter.
The two most important things to remember in business are: to be aware of the consequential impact on ecology, and a caring relationship between employer and employee.
I like to joke that Inhofe is as far left as I'll go for an employer.
Amnesty is the magnet. Other magnets that you mentioned are anchor babies who get benefits in this country and employer deductions for employees, even if they are here illegally, which Mr. King is addressing.
It can feel like an invasion of privacy, involving an employer in a personal matter.
Why did I start with them? Why do any of us choose one company over another as an employer? The money? At the beginning they all offer more or less the same and no one know how it will go after that. I guess it is often not so much your prospects at a particular firm, because these are essentially unknowable, but whether people will think you have done well to get the job there, that determines you choice. That was largely it in my case. It was really the prestige. They gave good letterhead.
The employee is regarded by the employer merely in the light of his value as an operative. His productive capacity alone is taken into account.
We will never regain control of our borders until we have an effective employer sanctions program.
Nothing is more dangerous than a poor doctor: not even a poor employer or a poor landlord.
